However, the most startling finding was that 60% of respondents – smaller businesses which do not pay the apprenticeship levy - were unaware that they could still offset up to 95% of apprenticeship training costs, making it a far more affordable option than previously assumed. In contrast, levy-paying members were largely aware of financial support mechanisms and were more likely to invest in apprenticeships. Despite these challenges, there was still strong support for the programme, with 73.4% of respondents stating that they found the apprenticeship effective in addressing the industry’s skills gap. However, opinions on the current two-year duration were mixed, with some participants arguing that it was suitable while others preferred a shorter timeframe of 18 months or even one year. Recommendations for Improvement Based on the feedback received, the survey identified several key recommendations to enhance the accessibility and effectiveness of the apprenticeship programme: 1. Greater awareness: to better inform businesses about the financial benefits and value of apprenticeship training. 2. Enhanced course content: incorporating more practical training, particularly focusing on fault-finding, compliance regulations and real-world troubleshooting scenarios. 3. Flexible delivery and duration: more adaptable structure that would allow apprentices to progress at a pace that aligns with employer needs. 4. Additional support mechanisms: further assistance in managing apprenticeships for employers, including mentorship guidance and structured progress updates. Exploring Short-Duration Courses One of the most intriguing recommendations to emerge from the survey is the potential development of short-duration courses tailored to individuals with varying levels of experience. These courses would take key elements of the existing apprenticeship programme and adapt them for different career stages, offering a more flexible learning approach. Such an initiative could benefit not only new entrants but also experienced professionals looking to upskill without committing to a full two-year programme. Moving Forward Ken Price, Managing Director of ADSA, welcomed the findings and reaffirmed the association’s commitment to continuous improvement: “We appreciate the valuable insights from our members. This feedback provides a foundation for future improvements and underscores the need for increased awareness. We are committed to refining the apprenticeship programme to better serve the industry and support the development of skilled technicians.” Carl Black, field support manager for dormakaba UK, expressed his support for the current apprenticeship structure: “From my perspective, the two-year duration and course content provide apprentices with a solid foundation to succeed in this industry. Rather than making changes to the programme, I would support a focus on encouraging businesses to support apprenticeships and invest in the next generation of skilled professionals. The current format works well and our priority should be to increase industry participation to ensure a strong future workforce.” The Apprenticeship for Powered Pedestrian Door Technicians has played a crucial role in equipping individuals with the necessary skills to succeed in the industry. While awareness and accessibility remain key challenges, the survey findings provide a roadmap for future enhancements. By addressing these barriers, implementing recommended improvements and considering the introduction of short-duration courses, ADSA is taking proactive steps to strengthen the industry talent pipeline. With continued investment in training and development, the sector can look forward to a well-equipped, highly skilled workforce that meets the demands of today’s fast-evolving market. For further information about the apprenticeship contact: fae@adsa.org.uk or call 01827 216136. Also online at: www.dijonline.co.uk Industry News 13 THE door industry journal spring 2025
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy Mzg2Nzk=